Visionary Voices: Nancy Thaler Ch 6

Chapter Transcript

Chapter 6: Self-determination

06:20:39:25 - 06:21:33:26 Lisa: Did that experience lay the groundwork for self-determination?

Nancy: Laid the groundwork for everything. I mean, once you give - you reverse or invert the power, it's inverted, and so, certainly I think about the closure of Western Center. Families interviewed four and five providers, they picked the providers, and went out and picked the house. And so, that's the essence of self-determination. I control what happens to me. I control who touches me. I control who supports me. I control where I go. All those words, self-determination, all that stuff all makes sense, 'cause people now had some experience with acting on it. But, and what we learned is that it's incredibly inconvenient for people in power. Too bad.

06:21:54:04 - 06:23:22:08 Lisa: Wanted to go back to the concept of self-determination. There certainly was a pilot project in Pennsylvania supported by the Robert Wood Johnson foundation. You've talked a lot about what self-determination means and what control means for people with disabilities. I'm recalling a conversation I had with Debbie Robinson about the issue of self-determination and Debbie said in hindsight she wished she had approached self-determination differently because in sharing that philosophy with other self-advocates, she said she was taking to folks who hadn't been allowed in their lives, because of their maybe, because they lived in institutions or because they had been perhaps not allowed freedoms in their day-to-day lives, people couldn't make basic choices like what they'd have for breakfast. Or she would take folks to conferences and there would be a buffet and people would be afraid to take food from the table, not sure if they were entitled or allowed. She said some people were having difficulty making the most basic choices in life. How do you tell them they can control their budget and make choices about their services and providers? And I don't know what experience you had or what your thought were about that, having been in state government when the self-determination pilot project was put in place.

06:23:33:08 - 06:26:56:17 Nancy: At one time when people would ask me to come and speak and talk, and talk about self-determination I would tell them a story about my sister-in-law and her little girl. And the story was that my sister-in-law took her two year old little girl to the doctors for a physical and my sister was a really good mother and she really listens and - but they live in a farm and they're a great distance from the doctors. It's twenty miles. And she took Ellie to the office and the doctor went to undress her and Ellie said no. And really didn't want the doctor to look at her. And I'm always aligned with my sister-in-law, but in that case I know I would have said, 'Ellie, I drove twenty miles, we know the doctor, Mommy's here. You got to take your shirt off, the doctor's gonna look at you." But my sister-in-law didn't. She said, "Ellie that's okay. If you don't want the doctor to look at you, that's okay. We'll leave, and when you think it's okay we can come back." And what I tell everybody is what did Ellie learn? She learned, 'I'm in charge of my body, and nobody can look at it without me saying it's okay'. She really learned that lesson that day. And if you met Ellie today at 15, she's the same girl and we don't have to worry about Ellie's victimization or what Ellie's gonna do. And so when I think about self-determination I'm far more interested in it at the level of that intimacy. Self-determination on a daily basis that's far more important than, did you get to pick the house you want to live in? That's important but what's the point if you don't have the confidence and self-assurance of saying 'you can't touch me', or 'I'm not gonna eat that because I don't like it', or 'I'm wearing jeans today because that's what I want to wear'. And I think that it starts with families and it starts when children are young and it's a particularly challenging skill to build in children with disabilities because their life experience is one of dependency. I mean, these are the kids who get made fun of, who are denigrated, who are putdown. So they already are one step behind in building the sense of self-esteem and self-control and then we teach them compliance, because we punish them for not being compliant, and that's all I think very, very problematic. And it's, you know, we have a terrifically high rate of abuse, including sexual abuse, among people with cognitive disabilities. Astronomically high. Because they don't learn to say no. And so I think of it in those terms far more than I think about controlling a budget and hiring and firing staff. That will come very naturally if people have personal power over their own lives. Debbie's right. Debbie's right in that its hard to talk to people about good choices when they don't get to make little choices.

Lisa: Little choices that maybe aren't so little.

Nancy: That's right. They're foundational.

About Nancy Thaler

Born: 1949, Kingston, PA
Executive Director, NASDDDS; formerly Director of Quality Improvement, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Disabled and Elderly Health Program Group (2003-2006); past Pennsylvania Deputy Secretary for Mental Retardation (1993-2003)

Keywords

Community Collaborative, Pennhurst, Self-Advocacy, Everyday Lives, Self-Determination

The Disability and Change Symposium is available as a free online learning module.

Combating Implicit Bias: Employment

Disability and Change 2020 logo

Go to the learning module

About this year's theme

Employment statistics for persons with disabilities continue to be disappointing, ~19% compared to ~66% of peers without disabilities. (US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2018). We ask ourselves, "is there something beyond overt discrimination and access that perhaps we need to address? Are there silent barriers such as those created by implicit bias?"

Most of us believe that we are fair and equitable, and evaluate others based on objective facts. However, all of us, even the most egalitarian, have implicit biases – triggered automatically, in about a tenth of a second, without our conscious awareness or intention, and cause us to have attitudes about and preferences for people based on characteristics such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, and religion. These implicit biases often do not reflect or align with our conscious, declared beliefs. (American Bar Association, Commission on Disability Rights, "Implicit Bias Guide," 2019)

This year's theme challenges us to each ask ourselves "What implicit bias(es) do we have and encounter, and how do we recognize them and move beyond them to create opportunities, welcome, and full participation for all?"

As always, this Symposium privileges first-person voices and experiences.

About the Disability and Change Symposium

The stated goal of the annual Symposium is "to create conversation that transcends any one-dimensional depiction of people with disabilities, and foregrounds the multidimensional lives of our speakers - as writers, educators, performers, and advocates."

The Disability and Change Symposium is a one-day, interdisciplinary conference focusing on cultural equity and disability. The event is free, accessible and open to the public.

Acknowledgments

Organized by the Institute on Disabilities at Temple University, the Symposium is an outcome of collaboration with the Interdisciplinary Faculty Council on Disability whose mission is "to foster collaboration across Temple University on disability-related projects including research, teaching, programming, publication, and grant-seeking. By connecting with one another, Council members help build community among the growing number of people at Temple whose work engages with disability."

Core funding for the Disability and Change Symposium is through a grant from the Center for the Humanities at Temple University (CHAT)

We extend our appreciation to Disability Resources and Services for providing Communication Access Realtime Translation (CART) and American Sign Language services for the day.

The Institute on Disabilities, Temple University College of Education is pleased to recognize some of our 2020 Symposium Partners/Sponsors from Temple University:

This year we also want to recognize the contributions of students (Associate Professor Deb Blair, STHM 2114 - Leisure & Tourism in a Diverse Society), who contributed to shaping and supporting this symposium:

  • Madeline Culbert, School of Sport, Tourism, and Hospitality Management; Bachelor of Science: Tourism and Hospitality Management (est. 08/2021)
  • Jair Guardia, School of Sport, Tourism, and Hospitality Management, Bachelor of Science: Tourism and Hospitality Management. (est. 08/2021)
  • Hallie Ingrim, School of Sport, Tourism, and Hospitality Management Bachelor of Science: Tourism and Hospitality Management
  • Thomas Leonard, School of Sport, Tourism, and Hospitality Management Bachelor of Science: Tourism and Hospitality Management (est. 08/2021)
  • Bryan McCurdy, School of Sport, Tourism and Hospitality Management, Bachelor of Science: Tourism and Hospitality Management (est. 05/2022)

Go to the learning module

Top of Page ↑

All of the content on the Visionary Voices web site is the property of the Institute on Disabilities at Temple University, or other respective owner. Any copying, reproduction, distribution, or other duplication of this material other than for purposes of viewing the web site is strictly prohibited. Copyright 2012-2021, Institute on Disabilities at Temple University, or as to any particular work, the respective owners thereof.